Month: April 2008

Date: April 27, 2008
Scripture: Genesis 11:1-9
Sermon: Divinity and Diversity
Pastor: Rev. Kim Wells

A massive new study by Robert Putnam, best known for his 2000 book Bowling Alone shows that the greater the level of diversity in a community, the less people will vote or volunteer, give to charity or work on community projects. “People living in ethnically diverse settings appear to ‘hunker down’ – that is, to pull in like a turtle,” Putnam writes. Some commentators think that the findings undermine arguments for diversity or multiculturalism – a conclusion that Putnam feared. Others argue that di-versity is a fact of life and that ultimately diversity aids problem solving, since people from different cultures bring different perspectives. (Boston Globe, August 5)

Anxiety is the heightened sense of fear, apprehension, threat or danger. It is a natural response, partic-ularly to stressful situations. It can motivate a person to focus and respond appropriately. Test anxiety can lead to greater preparation and focus. Anxiety produced by a threatening situation can lead to the appropriate fight or flight response.

But anxiety can also result from social alienation, bullying, perceived threats, insecurity about the future, terrorism, global warming, crime, unemployment. The fomenting of fear contributes to the anxi-ety in our culture. According to the National Institutes of Health 40 million people in the United States over the age of 18 suffer from clinically diagnosed anxiety. That’s 18% of the population. And 8-10 out of every 100 children and adolescents suffer from diagnosed anxiety. There has been a sig-nificant increase in anxiety among children, and college students of today compared with students of the 1950s. (University of Maryland.edu) With the increase in the drugs used to treat anxiety, it has become a Common parlance in the fare of comedians: Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Kloapin, Xanax, Valium, Ativan. Anxiety in our culture is real and it is growing.

In the story of the tower of Babel, the people are afraid and anxious. They have been instructed to disperse and populate the earth. But they are afraid. They want to stay together. Security in numbers. They migrate together and find a suitable place to settle and get started. “Come, let us build ourselves a city otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.” (Gen. 11:4) Their response to their fear is to build a city, a sturdy, solid city of bricks. To dig in and become established so they won’t have to spread out and populate the whole earth – The tower will symbolize their power. They will be secure. They will be entrenched.

We have explored why the people built the tower and what it represents. Now let us turn to why the language of the people was confused and the people were scattered. One view is that this can be seen as punishment for their pride and arrogance. They think they know best and ignore God’s commands – to populate the whole earth. They want to make a name for themselves. Soar above their mundane existence to celestial heights. They want to transcend the limits of their creaturely condition. They are self-satisfied with their accomplishments. So in punishment for their arrogance, pride, and self-centeredness, they are scattered.

This effort to build the tower is also symbolic of concentration of power, centralization, control, and hierarchy. This inevitably leads to abuse of power, oppression and corruption. As British historian, Lord Acton of the 19th century has said, “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” So the language is confused and the people scattered to prevent the corruption that accompanies hierarchy and the centralization and concentration of power.

This is an interesting indictment for us to consider, when we live in a country that prides itself on free-dom and democracy, the sharing of power, while spreading the American way of life worldwide, com-plete with Wal-Mart and McDonald’s. We are exporting our pre-packaged culture, products, lifestyle, and language, fostering uniformity. This movement was symbolized by the destruction of the World Trade Towers. This uniformity and centralization is the very thing that is destroyed in the Babel story because it will inevitably become corrupt and lead to tyranny. You can believe that Osama bin Laden knows scripture.

Another answer to the question, why was the language confused and the people scattered in the Babel story involves honor and reverence for God. These people felt they could take care of themselves. They could take themselves to God, if they desired; they did not need to wait for God to come to them. They did not need God. They had technology, thank you very much. Which can be extremely dangerous unless accompanied by reverence for God and God’s moral vision – ask the people of Afghanistan and Iraq for a start.

So as we reflect on the story, we see God confusing the language and scattering the people really to save them from themselves. But there is more.

In the creation story of Genesis chapter one, after creating the human creature, God instructs, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth.” In other words, spread out, scatter. God wants humans to care for all creation. To do that, they must soar throughout the earth to protect and keep it all.

After the story of Noah and the flood, God instructs Noah and his family, “Be fruitful and multiply, abound on the earth, multiply in it.” Again, God’s desire is for humans to spread over all the earth to tend and nurture it. To preserve all of creation.

Then comes the story of the tower of Babel. The people have one language. They migrate together. They find a good place to settle. And they desire to build a city with a tower and live there so that they will not be scattered across the face of the earth. (Gen 11:4) So the very thing God wants them to do, for the good of all creation, they are refusing to do. The well-being of the whole creation depends on the people inhabiting the whole earth to tend and keep it and they are refusing.

The creation itself is characterized by vast diversity – in the land forms and contours in the waters, in the climates and biomes, in the life forms. There is diversity beyond our wildest dreams. When hu-manity spreads it will have to diversify to live in the differing areas, and widely ranging circumstances. The polar regions with extreme cold and extreme darkness and light require a lifestyle vastly different from adaptation to life in the tropics, and those in between. So spreading around the world necessitates that humanity diversify.

This not only ensures the perpetuation of the human species, but it potentially may prevent the other problems like concentrated power associated with the building of the city and the tower. Spreading and diversifying could stem pride and arrogance. It could dampen the tendency for widespread domi-nation and control. It could lessen the developing of the illusion of independence and isolation from God leading to dependence on human ability and technology with a higher moral authority.

Spreading and diversifying was meant to curb the human impulses that could lead to destruction and put creation at risk. Diversity is also intended to give humans more of a sense of the richness of God and creation. No one language alone captures it all. No one culture fully expresses the divine image in the human creature. One view of the world expressed in one language is far too limited to communi-cate the glory of God and creation.

In the story of Babel, the language is confused and the people scattered. This may look like the work of an angry, punishing God. But the greater purpose is ensuring the future of the whole creation. Di-versity is not intended as a burden producing conflict and strife. It is intended as a gift to protect all of creation; to enrich human existence; and to glorify the sacred – in the many ways it may be named or known. Diversity is a blessing given by a love that is greater than all we will ever know and, sadly, we have squandered the gift, and used it to oppress and destroy not only our own species, but the whole of creation. We have used this glorious gift to promote anxiety and fear.

KIM, I DON’T KNOW WHERE TO GO FROM HERE SO I WILL CONTINUE AND THEN YOU CAN CUT AND PASTE.

This must bring great sadness to God. As author Jonathan Swift has said, “We have just enough reli-gion to make us hate, but not enough religion to make us love one another”

As Christian people, followers of Jesus, we must promote God’s vision of the blessing of diversity. We must be committed to this vision. We must be dogged in our efforts to value, affirm, and appreciate the vast diversity God intends not only in the land, plants, protysts, fungi, and non-human animals. But we must particularly celebrate the miraculous diversity of the human species and culture.

There are those who maintain that if we tolerate differences, appreciate diversity, celebrate multicultu-ralism – we have no convictions. If you have an open mind, they say, your brains fall out. On the contrary – to have an open mind about diversity and difference is to have deep moral conviction, faith, and belief. It is a commitment to God’s vast vision for all of creation. It is praise of God’s glory!

There are those who would make us afraid of the “other,” of those who are different, “foreign.” An-xiety is created over the diversifying of the United States. The greater fear should be the fear of ho-mogeneity, uniformity, and centralization as Empire, which has far more potential for destruction. It is in direct conflict with the vision of God. There is a bumper sticker that says, “I love my country…but I think we should start seeing other people.” If you want to reduce your anxiety and anxiety in this world, don’t circle in isolation. Look out. Seek out people who are different than you. Learn about another culture. Study another religion. Learn a new language. Relish the richness of creation. Cele-brate God’s wondrous imagination and glorious vision for creation! And we may reduce the need for Prozac.

Amen

Date: April 13, 2008
Scripture: Acts 2: 42-47
Sermon:The Church of 2048
Pastor: Rev. Kim Wells

How many of you remember 1968? That is the year that Lakewood United Church of Christ closed its charter and was officially established.

What was going on as this small group of Christians, even smaller than the church is now, responded to God’s call to form a church? What was the context in which these courageous souls made a commitment to go out on a limb and form a new faith community?

As recent newspaper articles remind us, Martin Luther King was assassinated in 1968. Robert Kennedy was assassinated, as well. Richard Nixon was nominated for president. The film 2001: A Space Odyssey debuted. My elementary school took us on a field trip to see it. Johnny Cash recorded Folsum Prison in 1968. It was the year of the Prague Spring when Czechoslovakia tried to assert its freedom and was squashed by the no longer extant USSR. The Broadway musical HAIR opened. Yale went co-ed. The Civil Rights Movement, the anti-war movement, the war on poverty, the environmental movement were all in full swing.

In 1968 when Lakewood was founded, there were high hopes for eradicating many social problems – like poverty, racism, environmental destruction, and war. And a small group of people went out on a limb founding this church.

In 1968, Christianity was the dominant religion in the United States. Yes, there were Jews, but Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, Mormons, weren’t even on the main stream map. Christianity was considered part of day to day culture in the United States. In 1968, Sunday morning worship did not compete with soccer games, fun runs, or charity golf.

Alvin Toffler, iconic futurist published Future Shock in 1970. We learned that the accelerating pace of social and technological change would overwhelm people. They would become disoriented, suffering from what Toffler called “shattering stress” How many of us feel like we are taking a shower in Niagara Falls? As Toffler predicted, we have experienced “too much change in too short a period of time.”

For the most part, the church has been caught in this swirl of change, this paradigm shift and is dizzy and reeling. Conservatism and fundamentalism have become more entrenched and more prominent, and more appealing as people seek stability and assurance in these shifting sands of change. The liberal church became less relevant as its social agenda was increasingly promoted by secular groups and movements.

So what’s ahead for society in the United States and in the church? Population increase will continue from 200 million in 1968 to 300 million in 2006, to a projected 438 million in 2048. We are told that the population will be older, with increases in life expectancy. The US population will not only be older but more diverse. By 2048, 48% of the population will be white Euro-American. The largest non-white minority will be Hispanic. Most of the 52% of non-whites will be immigrants. The economy will be global. The underclass will be larger. Society will be more fluid. Religion we are told will have a growing role in public discourse and world affairs, but will not be monolithically Christian. There will be more technology – developing faster. So younger people today who feel pity for us older folks who can’t keep up, are going to be left in the dust in later years We are told we will have more leisure (sure, that’s what they said in 1968) and no seafood – you won’t be fishing in your free time in 2048 because the world is projected to run out of harvestable seafood stocks by 2048

So what does this all mean for the church as we move toward 2048? Christianity in the US will be a decidedly minority movement, in a diverse culture, experiencing the dislocation and disorientation of racing social and technological change. This is already happening. The shifts and decline in mainline Protestantism have mostly to do with the changes in society around us. And we are in a period of trying to discern a new place, a new role, social events, brunches, etc
Sunday morning your choices were pretty much to sleep, read the newspaper, go to the beach. You didn’t mow the lawn because then people would see that you weren’t in church.

In 2048, the options for things to do other than church will have greatly expanded. So, what will church be like? Here, let’s look back, way back to Acts, when Christianity was a small, fringe movement, in a culture dominated by other forces. In the first century Christians were by far the minority. Christian values were decidedly different from cultural values. Because that’s the kind of context the church will be facing in the decades ahead. In Acts, as we heard this morning, the believers “devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship in the breaking of bread and the prayers.” Day by day they devoted themselves to these activities (not just Sundays). And they shared goods, resources, and money in common. And many signs and wonders were done. We know that the early Christian community was marked by extreme diversity – people of different backgrounds, cultures, and classes mixed together in the individual churches. And their commitment to caring for one another in the spirit of Christ considered strange and dangerous and subversive. Elaine Pagels in Beyond Belief tells us of how early Christians were considered peculiar and threatening.

They welcomed the sick, those without money, those in distress and offered help for free. No dues. No fees. Unlike Roman religious practices. They helped orphans living on garbage dumps. Gave out food and medicine. Helped those in prison. They cared for the sick without fear of contagion. They drove out “destructive energies that cause mental instability and emotional anguish,” Pagel tells us (p.7) their actions were based on a spiritual experience with a God who loves humans and evokes love in return.

And this movement of generosity, compassion and service, was considered “an enemy of the public good; of the gods; of public morals,” of all that patriotic, religious Romans held sacred (Pagel p.11) Christianity was looked upon as a criminal cult. People were kicked out of their families, lost jobs, friendship, and social standing for becoming Christian. So Christians had to depend upon one another to survive.

This glimpse at first century Christianity, as we heard about in Acts shows us the church as a minority, subversive movement, which is the way we are heading in 2048. The basic values of Christianity – love of neighbor, service, other-centered living, generosity, compassion, justice, concern for the poor, the dying, the forgotten – these basic core commitments will be strange and alien in 2048. And yet, this kind of movement, and these values, will be needed more than ever as people experience the disorientation and dislocation that comes with increasing technological changes and depersonalization, and individualism.

As Toffler puts it, looking ahead from 1970, “Society needs people who take care of the elderly and who know how to be compassionate and honest. Society needs people who work in hospitals. Society needs all kinds of skills that are not just cognitive. They need emotional and affectionate skills. You cannot run the society on data and computers alone” (from Wikipedia, Alvin Toffler)

So the church of 2048 will be high touch to balance high tech. People will go deeper in their discipleship because Christian values will be more at odds with society –
by volunteering,
by reaching out to the poor,
by giving of money,
by lifestyle changes that are environmental,
by cultivating diverse community,
by advocacy in the public realm
People in church will have more contact with each other, not just once a week or once a month, but virtually daily – to sustain faith and hope and humanity in the face of increasing alienation in the culture. This contact will be more face to face, high touch, and through electronics, high tech. The church of 2048 will involve more teaching, training, and learning, because we won’t be able to assume that people know about the Christian story and the Bible. and church history. And knowing this story and tradition is essential to connecting to God and the hope and promise of Jesus Christ needed as people feel more adrift in changing times. This means we will need to become more comfortable talking about our faith experience without being preachy or pushy. We will need to be able to articulate how our faith grounds us so that we can offer that lifeline to others.

So, in many ways, the church of 2048 will look like the church of Acts.
High commitment.
Alternative life style.
Family centered.
Life-line of hope ,
Counter culture community.
Distinct minority.
Subversive generosity.
Compassion and service.
Diverse.
Welcoming of the poor, the sick and those in distress.
Definitely out on a limb compared with current Christianity.

If the church is not bringing God’s moral vision to bear on the greed, individualism, separation and anxiety being created in our culture, then it will not be needed. If the church is not a community of support and hope to those alienated by corporate America, advancing technology, and increasing violence, it will not be needed. If the church is not reaching out with a story of love and compassion inviting others to find their place in the drama, then it will not be needed. If the church is not engendering respect for nature and all species, it will not be needed.
If the church is not a community of healing and wholeness in an increasingly fractured and divided world, it will not be needed.

Lakewood United Church of Christ was founded by a faithful community responding to God’s call. This church is here because God needed it and wanted it. This church is the fulfillment of God’s hopes and dreams for a faith community to embody the love and justice of Jesus. And Lakewood has gone out on a limb to be that community. For Lakewood United Church of Christ in 1968, going out on a limb meant being multi-racial. In the 1970s it meant reaching out to the poor by helping to found Habitat for Humanity and working with the farm workers. In the 1980s going out on a limb meant making a commitment to justice and peace and establishing the first sister church relationship recognized by the State Dept. with St. Job’s in Leningrad, USSR, now St. Petersburg, Russia. In the 1990s going out on a limb meant an expansive welcome to all people as seen in our mission statement.

What does going out on a limb mean in this first decade of the 2nd millennium? What will it mean in the teens, the 2020s, the 2030s, and 40 years from now in the 2040s? We’ll never find out, if we don’t go out on the limb now with a commitment to deep discipleship that will transform us and the world. We have the template in Acts. And we have a bold, courageous history from the past 40 years

Zaccheus went out on a limb to see Jesus. Jesus went out on a limb giving up his life for God’s love. Will we go out on a limb to be a community of healing and hope empowered by the spirit of Christ? Out on a limb – that’s where the best fruit is. Amen

Date: April 6, 2008
Scripture: Luke 24: 13-35
Sermon: We Will Walk With God
Pastor: Rev. Kim Wells

Some of you may remember the classic movie, “Guess Who is Coming to Dinner” featuring Spencer Tracy and Katherine Hepburn and Sidney Poitier. It’s about a white family, and the daughter invites her fiancé’, a black man, to dinner. But, of course, it was about much more than three white people and one black person eating food together. Because much more than eating happens at a meal. There is conversation. There is sharing. Things emerge and develop beyond the food. In fact, in Africa, there is a proverb, “Relationship is in the eating together.” By eating dinner together bonds develop; links are made; stories are shared; and the world is changed.

In the ancient world, in some cultures, and still today, sharing food is a basic requirement of civil society. The dictates of hospitality cannot be violated. A stranger is to be offered food, a meal, no matter what. An interaction or a chance meeting near mealtime means eating together. This is unquestioned. To neglect this basic social requirement would be as egregious as say, spitting on someone in our culture. A very serious affront. Eating together signifies many different things. It shows the universality of our basic human need for food, whether you are rich or poor, young or old, regardless of language or culture, all people need to eat to live. So sharing food affirms our common humanity. Eating together is also about security. In the ancient world, the stranger was always invited to eat. This way you knew who was in your territory. It was for your safety. And it was for the safety of the stranger, because they would have need for food and shelter and protection from possible threats. The cross-cultural commitment to sharing food and hospitality was your assurance that you would be cared for if you took a journey.

By eating together, trust, understanding, and community were fostered between friends, families, and strangers. These are important connections and bonds that weave a web of care and compassion. It may be necessary to mutual survival, not only in the ancient world but maybe more so in today’s world with our increased capacity for violence and destruction.

We see this theme of eating together and sharing food appear again and again in the Bible. Abraham invites three strangers into his tent. They end up being angels with a message from God of blessings. Elijah shares food with the widow of Zaraphath. They are sustained throughout the drought. Esther invites her husband, the king, to dinner and saves her people. There is that wonderful verse from Psalm 23: “You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies.” Table fellowship is a way to reconciliation and peace. The Exodus, the saving story of slavery to freedom, is marked by a shared meal, the Passover.
In the Christian Testament, Jesus is repeatedly involved in situations involving shared food. There is the wedding at Cana and a turning of water into wine. Eating with Simon, the Pharisee. Eating with Mary and Martha and having his feet anointed. Eating with Zaccheus. Eating with the disciples. Sharing food with the multitudes. In fact, Jesus is accused of eating with the tax collectors and sinners – the wrong sort, and of being a glutton and a lush.

And then the Christian Gospels are filled with stories about eating and feasts and who would and wouldn’t come, and who does and doesn’t share food. Always showing that God’s realm is like a feast where everyone is welcome.

It is in the sharing of food, our common human need, that we experience God’s presence in human community. Eating together celebrates our commonality and the generosity of the Giver of Life who sustains that life with food. It is in this context that community develops. And God ,is experienced.

So in the Emmaus story, these nobodies, Cleopas and a companion, experience Jesus’ presence, not in the talking or the teaching, but in the eating. As they share a meal Jesus affirms their common humanity, their common need. Over food, there is the opportunity to share stories and develop understanding that fosters community, reconciliation, peace, and the healing of the betrayal and desertion and crucifixion begins. Jesus does not starve them or punish them

And so the core sacrament, the shared tradition, the common bond across culture of the Christian church, the body of Christ, is the sharing of bread and the cup. And this extends, in many church contexts, to shared meals.

It is in sharing food together that we have the context that celebrates and reveals God’s goodness and love. It is in the context of eating a meal that we are fed physically and spiritually. It is in the context of breaking bread that healing and reconciliation can occur.

Sadly, in our American culture and in the church, eating together is no longer common or customary. Families used to eat together, without interruption. Then came the phone, the activities, clubs, and sports over the dinner hour, and TV and the advent of the TV dinner. The focal point of the meal was no longer conversation, but watching TV. Complex work schedules, school schedules, etc., have all conspired against families and friends eating together. This has contributed to the weakening of family ties, community, and church.

When we neglect the opportunity to eat together, our sense of our common humanity erodes. The context for building relationship and community diminish. We lose the natural setting for experiencing God’s presence in food and fellowship. We miss the revelation of God’s goodness and grace. We neglect the gathering where reflection and conversation create community and reconciliation. It is over a meal that Jesus and his friends make peace. It is over a meal that the divine is experienced. It is over a meal that Christ comes to me through you. It is over a meal that compassion and healing emerge. And yet in our cultural context the sharing of food happens less and less.

Some years ago a group from the Florida Conference of the United Church of Christ went to visit our partner church in Argentina. When they returned, they told us that when they start a new church in Argentina the first thing they build is the kitchen so they can come together to eat. Later they build the sanctuary. It is in the eating and the accompanying fellowship that they experience Christ’s presence.

If Cleopas and his companion had only walked and talked with the stranger, they would not have experienced the presence of the risen Christ. New life and hope emerge when food is shared. This is why it is important for us as Christians to continue the ministry of shared food.. Not only in the ritual context of communion, but with shared table fellowship in our homes, in restaurants, at picnics. This is where we will see Christ, where God’s love and generosity, compassion and grace are revealed. This is where we will foster God’s reconciliation and peace.

I recently read the story of a person here in the United States looking for a church home. After numerous visits, the decision was made not by location, theology, facilities, programs, or music. On one church visit, after the service a couple of people were making plans to go out to lunch. As they were talking they noticed this new visitor and said, “We’re going out to lunch. Would you be our guest? Can you join us?” The visitor had other plans that day, but was so impressed by the welcome, the hospitality, the offer to share a meal, that he joined the church.

We have eaten together at Christ’s table in this service. But that is just the appetizer. The taste. The sample that invites us to share table fellowship together, eating with one another,. including and inviting others, so that we experience the presence of Christ more deeply; so that our hearts burn with his love, and our eyes are opened to God within us. So, make sure, sometime soon, someone is coming to dinner!. Amen